When the state pays your wages - and the sun is shining - what’s the rush to get back to 'normal'?

Some extreme feminists as far back as the 1970's were suggesting the castration of all males older than 14. The idea being that as soon as boys are capable of manufacturing sperm that a few good usable samples are collected from them for storage. National castration day'. Nice logic there, retards. A person with a IQ higher than 75 Oct 08. The entire world should have an international holiday known as: 'Castration Day' Males of all ages will be brought to the public squares of their cities nude, to stand together in a circle, as they await castration by a woman known as 'The Castrator', who will be a woman chosen from the public much like a juror. Most things that go on in the internet with the tag 'Psychologists say' are from people who are not even qualified to become psychologists. So when we read something, we go back to check the author's credentials - who is the person (scholar/layman. Posts about Femen Castration written by Bernd Pulch. France Protest, Femen Feminist Group, Femen Forte, Femen French Election, Femen Fun.com, Femen Founder, Femen Front National, Femen France Le Pen, Femen Group, Femen Group France, Femen George Soros, Femen Germany, Femen Gallery, Femen Grand Prix, Femen Grand Prix Montreal, Femen Grand.

Sometimes I think I need to read this in black and white to actually believe it might be true.

A quarter of the British workforce is sitting at home in its pajamas receiving 80% of its pay, up to a maximum of £2,500 ($3,000) a month, guaranteed by the government until the end of June.

A similar scheme has been put in place for the self-employed.

The prime minister's official spokesman said: 'Since the launch, 800,000 employers have used the Job Retention Scheme to furlough 6.3 million jobs. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimated that the scheme would cost the Treasury a total £39bn.'

This incredibly over-generous scheme by the British government was grasped at hungrily by big business eager to retain labor without any of the costs.

Even small- and medium-sized business owners, usually reluctant to turn to the state for support and with resilience built into their models, caved to the scheme. It was simply too generous to refuse. The state now holds their employees in its warm embrace, just as with all the rest.

As for the employees, most have been delighted, and with good reason. In their minds, government money is free money, the invisible golden goose in the sky is laying golden eggs to pay for them to stay-cation with their family.

Prohibited from working under the furlough scheme, the need to do any work at all, or to feel any kind of guilt about taking money for doing nothing, has been completely absent from these sedentary fools.

They fail to see that what they are actually gobbling up, along with their takeaways and Netflix box sets, is almost as much cash as it costs to fund our NHS (National Health Service) on a monthly basis.

Talk to any head teacher or NHS manager and they will tell you the same woeful story of 'key-workers,' fearful of being asked to work through the lockdown while others sit at home, self-isolating on day one due to 'a vulnerable adult at home' showing 'symptoms.' Give many the opportunity to do nothing without penalty, and that is exactly what they will do.

As one furloughed gentleman said as he sat in the sun in his garden, and I quote: 'I retire in twelve months; if they want to pay me to sit here and sunbathe for the rest of that time, I couldn’t give a sh*t.'

This scheme needs to end. And fast. Until the government puts a stop to the furlough scheme and gives people an incentive to work again, many of those in the public sector will not.

Of course, the unions have come out swinging, threatening walkouts and strikes if the government tries to make people come back to work before it is 'safe to do so,' quoting from their union handbooks to rabble-rouse the idle.

The GMB, which has more than 600,000 members, said the back-to-work guidance being issued 'does not adequately protect workers from Covid-19 exposure and as a result many may refuse to work to avoid putting themselves and their families at risk.'

The Acting Secretary added: 'For weeks the government has warned people this virus is dangerous and they must maintain social distancing and abide by the lockdown. They cannot just flick a switch, say it’s safe to work within two meters of other people without PPE and expect them to head merrily off to work.'

And here’s the catch: the government has used fear in the UK as a mechanism of control. People are so terrified of COVID that rates of self-referral to the ER have dropped by 70%. People are too afraid of COVID to get the emergency help they need for their health. 60% say they will not send their children back to school at this stage. Fear is not easy to undo. The unions will manipulate it for the full benefit of public-sector workers.

Our private sector faces far harder truths. In reality, furloughed staff are unemployed.

The demand for most goods and services simply is not going to be there when the lockdown ends and China shows why: rides on the metro and flights are down by a third, discretionary spending on things like restaurants is down by 40% and hotel stays are down by two-thirds. Fear is hard to undo.

The furlough scheme in the UK is postponing inevitable redundancies at the cost of the taxpayer. There is going to be a cull. Some of us are not sheep; we can smell the slaughterhouse ahead of us. The only kindness is to make it as painless as possible.

By the end of May 2020 six million Brits may be unemployed, equivalent to 20% of the workforce and directly comparable to the USA. Americans are already hungry and hunting for work. British capital and labor is trapped in zombie businesses unaware, paralyzing all.

There are no easy ways out of this, and no answer to many of the biggest questions, such as 'Why would you collapse an economy for a virus with a mortality rate that looks like flu? Why force out all private ambition creating a nation of dependents? How could this happen on Boris Johnson’s watch?'

Watching state control at work has been an illuminating, if not deeply sinister experience. I have moved from feeling upset and then angry about it to watching with gory intrigue, like a student doctor gawking at a corpse.

The British government has successfully:

• driven fear into the heart of the British people, such that cancer patients dare not seek treatment, and asked neighbors to snitch on each other as a mechanism of control;
• grabbed power, locking down a nation with police enforcing rules that are neither written nor mandated;
• manipulated people’s emotions, persuading them to sign up to a volunteer army – 'all in this together' – but never giving them a single practical task, encouraging them to clap at the sky in support of the NHS on command at 8pm on Thursdays, and permitting a puritanical mob to out individuals for non-compliance;
• wielded fiscal and monetary levers to create a furlough scheme that ensures calm, controlled compliance

As this diagram shows, furloughing is a temporary measure allowing the government to achieve calm compliance from its citizens, yet leading inevitably to mass redundancies demand for goods and services after lockdown is no longer there.

I wonder if those who have been so willingly controlled by the state will ever question what happened to them. Whether they will look back at footage of themselves clapping at the sky on command ‘in support of the NHS’ and feel foolish, or wonder why massive emergency hospitals opened to great fanfare are now mothballed without ever serving a single patient. Will they see they were built on a lie?

I fear not.

Britain is entering a lost decade. Lockdown may lift but the economic damage will be profound; the economy may well reopen, but as China, Denmark and Sweden have shown, it will operate at less than half its usual demand.

In Europe’s five largest economies 30 million workers, a fifth of the workforce, are on special schemes where the state pays their wages. Preserving these firms is only delaying the inevitable. America had the decency to make its cull a swift one, its President and citizens fighting back for freedom from day one.

No longer propped up by government money, British businesses will go to the wall. China endured half a million business bankruptcies in the first quarter of 2020. Even those that remain in operation will be shadows of their former selves. Boeing warned that air travel will not reach 2019 levels for two or three years.

In Britain we are heading into a decade where our kids will not find work, the lowest-paid struggle to find casual work, and the rationing of healthcare will be even more extreme. Scarred by fear, people will look to the state for their every need. This recession we are accelerating into will make the Great Depression look like a bad Monday in Michigan.

Oblivious to this, compliant Brits have been reduced to a set of nodding dogs in the window, waiting to be fed their next paycheck, listening for their next instruction, looking to the hand that now feeds them to tell them what to do.

Today in Feminist History is our daily recap of the major milestones and minor advancements that shaped women’s history in the U.S.—from suffrage to Shirley Chisholm and beyond. These posts were written by, and are presented in homage to, our late staff historian and archivist, David Dismore.

From morning until night, an active, 12-hour workday for everyone here on the fifth day of the National American Woman Suffrage Association’s 45th annual convention.

The first business of the day was actually conducted outside the convention hall, as many prominent and articulate advocates for our cause went to Capitol Hill at 10:30 to testify before the House Rules Committee in favor of establishing a Standing Committee on Woman Suffrage in the House.

Among today’s speakers were Reverend Anna Howard Shaw, Carrie Chapman Catt, Jane Addams, and Ida Husted Harper, with Alva Belmont, Inez Milholland, Mary Ware Dennett and Alice Paul in the audience. Each speaker gave an excellent presentation showing why woman suffrage was now a movement of such national importance that it deserved its own permanent committee. According to Helen H. Gardener:

“For many years we have been sent before the Judiciary Committee once a year, if we so desired, to present our arguments for woman suffrage. We appear before it, year after year, one day for two hours, and that is the end of it. That committee is a very busy one. The President has notified it that it is to be still busier this session… But the woman suffrage question is pressing for immediate solution.”

Jane Addams was peppered with questions by a House member from Georgia who believed that “altering the electorate” was not a proper subject for discussion in Congress. Addams then proceeded to give him ten examples of when Congress had done exactly that.

A suggestion that “Woman Suffrage” be tacked on to the end of the name of the Committee on the Election of the President, Vice President and Representatives, was rejected by Reverend Shaw as well as the National American Woman Suffrage Association’s National Board. It is believed that the proposal for a new and separate committee which will deal only with woman suffrage now has majority support, and speculation that it might be established, then stacked with anti-suffragists is being discounted.

Still angry with President Wilson over his failure to mention woman suffrage in his message to Congress yesterday, Ruth Hanna McCormick made a motion that the convention demand an audience with the President to impress upon him the need for equal suffrage:

“Since the President omitted all mention of woman suffrage in his message of yesterday, and since he has announced that he will send several other messages to Congress outlining the measures which the Administration will support, I move that this convention wait upon the President in order to lay before him the importance of the suffrage question, and urge him to make it an Administration measure, and send immediately to Congress the recommendation that it proceed with this measure before any other. I also move that a committee of two be appointed to make the arrangements with the President.”

The motion was enthusiastically carried, then she and Madeline McDowell Breckenridge were appointed to make the necessary arrangements for the President to receive a delegation from the convention.

Feminist Castration

The coronavirus pandemic and the response by federal, state and local authorities is fast-moving. During this time, Ms. is keeping a focus on aspects of the crisis—especially as it impacts women and their families—often not reported by mainstream media.If you found this article helpful, please consider supporting our independent reporting and truth-telling for as little as $5 per month.